Most of today’s African fighters are not rebels with a cause they’re predators. soldier (now a rarity in Africa) to soldier vs. I’ve witnessed up close - often way too close - how combat has morphed from soldier vs. But most of my time is spent immersed in these un-wars. My job as the New York Times‘ East Africa bureau chief is to cover news and feature stories in 12 countries. But what is spreading across Africa like a viral pandemic is actually just opportunistic, heavily armed banditry. What we are seeing is the decline of the classic African liberation movement and the proliferation of something else - something wilder, messier, more violent, and harder to wrap our heads around. Look closely at some of the continent’s most intractable conflicts, from the rebel-laden creeks of the Niger Delta to the inferno in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and this is what you will find. Today’s rebels seem especially uninterested in winning converts, content instead to steal other people’s children, stick Kalashnikovs or axes in their hands, and make them do the killing.
They couldn’t care less about taking over capitals or major cities - in fact, they prefer the deep bush, where it is far easier to commit crimes. The combatants don’t have much of an ideology they don’t have clear goals.
There is a very simple reason why some of Africa’s bloodiest, most brutal wars never seem to end: They are not really wars.
0 kommentar(er)
